Thinking Fast & Slow | Summary
“The confidence that individuals have in their beliefs depends mostly on the quality of the story they can tell about what they see, even if they see little.”
-
Thinking
- System 1
- fast | also known as intuition
- System 2
- slow
- System 1
-
Framing
- example
- you have 2 new interviewees
- which one will you hire?
- Amit
- he is Intelligent, Industrious, impulsive, stubborn, critical, envious
- Sara
- she is envious, critical, stubborn, impulsive, industrious, intelligent
- Amit - sounds like he’s hardworking
- Sara - sounds like she’s difficult to work with
- they both are described using same words | only the order is changed
- they both have same qualities
- yet we see them as different
- this is System 1 thinking in play
- System 1
- fast thinking
- create meaning quickly
- make decision with very limited information
- help us jump to conclusions quickly
- make sense of partial information
- System 1 causes
- common mistakes in thinking
-
overconfidence
- our decisions are based on the quality of the story we tell our selves to justify them
- not on facts or rationality
-
framing
- how information is frames is more influential than the actual information
“Intelligence is not only the ability to reason; it is also the ability to find relevant material in memory and to deploy attention when needed.”
-
- common mistakes in thinking
- example
-
How to better process data to inform our choices
- asking right questions
- data is overwhelming
- to get best insights → ask the right questions
- example
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
- invested $1.7 Bil in schools
- They were shown a research - stating “all the best schools in US were small schools”
- so the investment was done to split schools into smaller units | creation of small schools
- this made intuitive sense
- smaller schools → more attention to individual students
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
- This was only a portion of the information
- The Researchers were asking-
- What were the characteristics of the best-performing schools?
- Had they asked the reverse questions-
- they would have realized that the worst performing schools were also small schools
- They confused correlation with causality
- Ask better questions
- Don’t stop asking questions when one of the answer makes intuitive sense
- The Researchers were asking-
- asking right questions
“we can be blind to the obvious, and we are also blind to our blindness.”
-
Optimism vs Overconfidence
- System1 thinking
- likes to believe that → the world is tidy, simple and predictable
- understand the past → make predictions about the future
- makes an illusion that we can control it
- Example
- share market
- only a set of information is available for everyone to use and decide
- using the same info → 2 things happen
- Seller → decides to sell it’s shares
- Buyer → decides to buy those shares
- same information = different opinions
- who is right?
- share market
- We are expected to be confident in our own abilities
- Optimism is essential to success
- bold predictions and moves are often rewarded
- optimism allows us to handle inevitable setbacks we will encounter
- Be aware →
- Blind optimism
- without reflection & learning
- leads to overconfidence
- & poor decision making
- Overconfidence
- hardest mistake to fix or adjust for in our thinking
- once born it takes roots into our
- thinking, forecasts, assumptions, goals & dreams
- it changes our view of
- ourselves
- our abilities
- & how much control we have over future
- This is because it’s deeply tied up with our Survival instinct
- Even if we are average
- we feel we are special, unique or
- above average in worst case
- Key
- know when optimism → has become → overconfidence
- PreMortem
- When making a decision in an organization
- gather a group of individuals who are knowledgeable about the decision or field
- setup a meeting
- ask this question
- we are now 1 year into future
- we have already executed the plan/decision as it exists right now
- but the outcome was a disaster
- please write a small paragraph on why that could happen
- feel free to use your imagination coming up with probable issues
- collect all answers and discuss
- dig out all little nuggets of the issues
- This is REFRAMING the Issue.
- Changes our focus from
- what can be gained → to → what could go wrong
- This has a positive impact on the team
- it allows them to anticipate criticism, as part of their daily job role
- so they learn to strengthen their arguments
- When making a decision in an organization
- System1 thinking
-
Overcome System 1’s Intuitive Impulses
-
example
- Interview
- dress well, speak well, read about the company
- show humility, passion, willingness to work hard
- these only make the interviewer feel good
- Interview
-
how to make sure you hire someone good and not just someone who feels good
- choose independent traits | that would satisfy the job role
- don’t pick more than 6
- example → proficiency, loyalty, numeracy, creativity, etc
- make sure they are independent of each other
- Confirm these traits by asking factual questions
- make a list of those question
- decide how you will score them | 1-5
- decide what answers will get 1 and what answers will get 5
- collect & question each trait one by one
- collect info about one before going to next
- add up the 6 scores
- hire the highest scores
- choose independent traits | that would satisfy the job role
-
Research shows this increases the probability of hiring the best candidates
“acquisition of skills requires a regular environment, an adequate opportunity to practice, and rapid and unequivocal feedback about the correctness of thoughts and actions.”
-
-
Intuition In Professional Decision-Making
- There are different types of professional intuition
- True Expert?
- someone who has worked, failed and been successful
- someone who understand the limits of their knowledge
- environment in which they learned is also important
- chess have 100k patterns
- fire fighting - fire burns in 100x patterns
- but share market can have no predicted patterns
- intuition can’t become expert
- without feedback
- and using that feedback along the journey
-
Prospect Theory
- for us losses and gains are valued differently
- traditionally people believed
- Gain of Rs. 100 🙂 🙂 | twice as happy
- Loss of Rs. 50 😟 | when compared to the loss
- losses impact us more profoundly than making the same amount of gains
- traditionally people believed
- individuals make decisions based on perceived gains instead of perceived losses
- We dislike losing > more than we like winning
- example
- we buy things we don’t need → just because it’s on sale
- in our mind we have made a gain and avoided a loss
- if you are presented with a choice, both equal, will choose the one presented in terms of potential gains
- Example
- you are offered
- Option A | Get Rs.900 right now
- Option B | a 90% chance of getting Rs.1000
- Now consider these two
- Option C | Lose Rs.900 right now
- Option D | Accept a 90% chance of losing Rs.1000
- you are offered
- Fear of loss
- Most people choose
- Option A → risk averse towards gains
- Option D → risk seeking towards loses
- Most people choose
- for us losses and gains are valued differently
Back to reading now!
Read India Lead India.
Comments
Post a Comment